Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Availability of Eye Care Providers in Florida

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the association between prevalence of visual impairment (VI) and density of eye care providers in Florida counties.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Population-based study included ophthalmologist members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, licensed optometrists, and respondents of the 2015-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) administered by the US Census Bureau. The number of ophthalmologists collected from the American Academy of Ophthalmology member directory and the number of optometrists collected from the Florida Department of Health License registry were compared with prevalence of VI in each county as reported by ACS 2020 5-year estimates. Median age, mean income, race, and percent uninsured of each county were collected from ACS 2020 5-year estimates. Main outcome measures included the number of eye care providers and prevalence of VI per Florida county.

Results: Eye care provider density and mean income of each county were negatively correlated with VI prevalence. Counties with zero eye care providers had significantly higher prevalence of VI per 100 000 residents than those with at least 1 eye care provider. While adjusting for mean income, for every increase in 1 eye care provider per 100 000 people, there was an expected decrease in VI prevalence by 31.15 ± 14.58 people per 100 000 residents. For every increase in mean county income by $1000, there was an expected mean ± SE decrease in prevalence of VI by 24.02 ± 9.90 people per 100 000 people.

Conclusions: Increased eye care provider density and mean county income are associated with lower prevalence of VI in Florida counties. Further studies may elucidate the cause for this relationship and solutions to decrease VI prevalence.