Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) such as Fenton's reagent, which generates highly reactive oxygen species, are efficient in removing biorefractory organic pollutants from wastewater. However, Fenton's reagent has drawbacks such as the generation of iron sludge, high consumption of H2O2, and the need for pH control. To address these issues, Electro-Fenton (EF) and heterogeneous Electro-Fenton (HEF) have been developed. HEF, which uses solid catalysts, has gained increasing attention, and this review focuses on the use of mineral catalysts in HEF and derived processes. The reviewed studies highlight the advantages of using mineral catalysts, such as efficiency, stability, affordability, and environmental friendliness. However, obstacles to overcome include the agglomeration of unsupported nanoparticles and the complex preparation techniques and poor stability of some catalyst-containing cathodes. The review also discusses the optimal pH range and dosage of the heterogeneous catalysts and compares the performance of iron sulfides versus iron oxides. Although natural minerals appear to be the best choice for effluents at pH>4, no scale-up reports have been found. The need for further development in this field and the importance of considering the environmental impact of trace toxic metals or catalytic nanoparticles in the treated water on the receiving ecosystem is emphasized. Finally, the article acknowledges the high energy consumption of HEF processes at the lab scale and calls for their performance development to achieve environmentally friendly and cost-effective results using real wastewaters on a pilot scale.
Keywords: Electro-Fenton; Heterogeneous catalysis; Iron minerals; Photoelectro-Fenton; Real wastewaters.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.