When do leaks occur? An analysis of the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Oct;19(10):1128-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.334. Epub 2023 May 4.

Abstract

Background: Leak is a feared complication of bariatric surgeries. Time to presentation is important in their management. We used the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to evaluate the rate and timing of leaks.

Objectives: To determine when leaks present after bariatric surgery.

Setting: MBSAQIP database.

Methods: The MBSAQIP Participant Use Files (PUF) for the years 2015-2020 were evaluated. Outcomes of interest were "organ space infection" and "leak." We evaluated the time to presentation for these variables as well as patient characteristics, operative time, complication rates and 30-day outcomes.

Results: There were 370,369 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) and 159,280 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (RYGB). We identified 598 (.16%) SG leaks with an average time to presentation of 13.2 ± 7.8 days. For RYGB, there were 520 leaks (.32%) with an average time to presentation of 9.5 ± 7.4 days. Both procedures had longer operative times for the patients with leak; RYGB was 115 minutes versus 131 minutes and SG was 67 minutes versus 77 minutes (both P < .01). SG and RYGB patients with a leak had a higher relative risk (RR) of grade 4 and 5 Clavien-Dindo complication rates. RR of mortality rates in SG patients with leak was 35.2 (confidence interval (CI): 20-61) and in RYGB with leak was 31.4 (CI: 19-50).

Conclusions: The length of time for SG leak presentation was more delayed than RYGB leak presentation. Surgeons should be vigilant for leaks for at least 3 weeks after surgery. Leaks increase the mortality rate and overall serious complications.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; MBSAQIP; Staple line leak; Time to leak.

MeSH terms

  • Accreditation
  • Bariatric Surgery*
  • Gastrectomy
  • Gastric Bypass*
  • Humans
  • Obesity, Morbid* / surgery
  • Quality Improvement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome