Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated with Graft Failure and Delayed Hematologic Recovery after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Abstract

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although previous reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with an increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association. We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting. We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution between January 2008 and December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 single antigen bead (SAB) assays; DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions; C1q-binding assay; and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, and the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0 to 61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% underwent allo-HCT for nonmalignant disease, Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive, including 10 with preexisting DSAs and 1 with post-transplantation de novo DSAs. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 patient had 2 DSAs, and 1 patient had 3 DSAs, with a median mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of 4334 (range, 588 to 20,456) and 3581 (range, 227 to 12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF, including 12 with primary graft rejection, 8 with secondary graft rejection, and 1 with primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidence of GF was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2% to 6.6%) at 28 days, 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2% to 9.8%) at 100 days, and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4% to 10.2%) at 365 days. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil recovery (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], .48; 95% CI, .29 to .81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR, .51; 95% CI, .35 to .74; P = .0003) compared to patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR, 7.60; 95% CI, 2.61 to 22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in the LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 versus 1250; P = .006) and in the LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 versus 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (HR, .50; 95% CI, .20 to 1.26; P = .14). Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Careful pretransplantation DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

Keywords: Delayed hematologic recovery; Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies; Graft failure; Unrelated donor transplantation.