Study design: A retrospective study.
Objective: To develop a new MRI scoring system to assess patients' clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications.
Methods: A retrospective 1-year follow-up study of 366 patients with cervical spondylosis from 2017 to 2021. The CCCFLS scores (cervical curvature and balance (CC), spinal cord curvature (SC), spinal cord compression ratio (CR), cerebrospinal fluid space (CFS). Spinal cord and lesion location (SL). Increased Signal Intensity (ISI) were divided into Mild group (0-6), Moderate group (6-12), and Severe group (12-18) for comparison, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), numerical rating scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Nurick scores were evaluated. Correlation and regression analyses were performed between each variable and the total model in relation to clinical symptoms and C5 palsy.
Results: The CCCFLS scoring system was linearly correlated with JOA, NRS, Nurick and NDI scores, with significant differences in JOA scores among patients with different CC, CR, CFS, ISI scores, with a predictive model (R2 = 69.3%), and significant differences in preoperative and final follow-up clinical scores among the 3 groups, with a higher rate of improvement in JOA in the severe group (P < .05), while patients with and without C5 paralysis had significant differences in preoperative SC and SL (P < .05).
Conclusions: CCCFLS scoring system can be divided into mild (0-6). moderate (6-12), severe (12-18) groups. It can effectively reflect the severity of clinical symptoms, and the improvement rate of JOA is better in the severe group, while the preoperative SC and SL scores are closely related to C5 palsy.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: C5 palsy; CCCFLS scoring system; MRI; clinical scores.