Purpose: We assessed the lesion detection performance of the dual-tracer parathyroid SPECT imaging using the joint reconstruction method.
Materials and methods: Thirty-six noise realizations were created from SPECT projections collected from an in-house neck phantom to emulate 99mTc-pertechnetate/99mTc-sestamibi parathyroid SPECT datasets. Difference images representing parathyroid lesions were reconstructed using the subtraction and the joint methods whose corresponding optimal iteration was defined as the iteration which maximized the channelized Hotelling observer signal-to-noise ratio (CHO-SNR). The joint method whose initial estimate was derived from the subtraction method at optimal iteration (the joint-AltInt method) was also assessed. In a study of 36 patients, a human-observer lesion-detection study was performed using difference images from the three methods at optimal iteration and the subtraction method with four iterations. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for each method.
Results: In the phantom study, both the joint-AltInt method and the joint method improved SNR compared to the subtraction method at their optimal iteration by 444% and 81%, respectively. In the patient study, the joint-AltInt method yielded the highest AUC of 0.73 as compared with 0.72, 0.71, and 0.64 from the joint method, the subtraction method at optimal iteration, and the subtraction method at four iterations. At a specificity of at least 0.70, the joint-AltInt method yielded significantly higher sensitivity than the other methods (0.60 vs 0.46, 042, and 0.42; p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The joint reconstruction method yielded higher lesion detectability than the conventional method and holds promise for dual-tracer parathyroid SPECT imaging.
Keywords: Dual-tracer technique; Image reconstruction; Parathyroid imaging; SPECT.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.