A comparison of isometric and isokinetic normalization methods for electromyographic data from sub-regions of supraspinatus and infraspinatus during dynamic tasks

Int Biomech. 2023 Dec;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2023.2210634.

Abstract

This study explored effects of using isometric versus isokinetic maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) to normalize EMG data from supraspinatus and infraspinatus subregions during isokinetic tasks. Participants performed submaximal isokinetic external rotation (ER) and scaption tasks at two speeds. Three isometric MVCs were used: seated ER; side-lying scaption; side-lying abduction. Isokinetic MVCs were performed in the same position and speeds as the experimental tasks. Data were normalized using peak EMG from reference tasks: MVC which produced the greatest amplitude overall (MEA), isometric MVC with greatest amplitude (isometric best), isokinetic MVC with greatest amplitude (isokinetic best), and the greatest amplitude from the isokinetic MVC that matched the experimental task (isokinetic matched). Mean %MVC from each experimental task/ sub-region were compared by normalization method. The isokinetic matched method versus the MEA method was significantly different in all comparisons with isokinetic matched resulting in relative normalized task values up to 162% greater. The isometric best method resulted in significantly greater %MVC 37% of the time compared to the MEA method, whereas there were no differences when using isokinetic best compared to MEA. Isokinetic MVCs are less likely to overestimate %MVC than isometric and their use should be considered when normalizing data from dynamic tasks.

Keywords: Supraspinatus sub-regions; fine-wire EMG; infraspinatus sub-regions; normalization.

MeSH terms

  • Electromyography / methods
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Humans
  • Isometric Contraction*
  • Movement
  • Rotator Cuff*