Objective: Patients starting with physical rehabilitation often hold unrealistically high expectations for their recovery. Because of a lower-than-expected rate of recovery, such unrealistic goals have been linked to adverse effects on mental health. Additionally, overtraining due to overly ambitious goals can lead to suboptimal recovery. We investigated the effectiveness of adjusting rehabilitation goals to a more realistic level as a strategy to select appropriate exercise intensity and achieve better recovery outcomes. Design: Patients with arm paralysis from recent stroke were recruited and went through 6-8 weeks of telerehabilitation and in-clinic rehabilitation programme conducted at 11 US sites (N = 124). Main Outcome Measures: Adjustment of recovery goal was assessed in two timepoints during the rehabilitation programme and arm motor function was assessed before and after the clinical trial. Results: Greater use of goal adjustment strategies predicted better recovery of arm motor function, independent from therapy compliance. This pattern was observed only when the choice of exercises is patient-regulated rather than directed by a physical therapist. Conclusion: Benefits from goal adjustment were more pronounced among patients who entered the programme with poorer motor functions, suggesting that goal adjustment is the most beneficial when goals of complete recovery are most unrealistic.
Keywords: Stroke rehabilitation; goal adjustment; realistic rehabilitation goals; telerehabilitaton.