Does air pollution confound associations between environmental noise and cardiovascular outcomes? - A systematic review

Environ Res. 2023 Sep 1:232:116075. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116075. Epub 2023 May 12.

Abstract

Background: Exposure to environmental noise is associated with adverse health effects, but there is potential for confounding and interaction with air pollution, particularly where both exposures arise from the same source, such as transport.

Objectives: To review evidence on confounding and interaction of air pollution in relation to associations between environmental noise and cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: Papers were identified from similar reviews published in 2013 and 2015, from the systematic reviews supporting the WHO 2018 noise guidelines, and from a literature search covering the period 2016-2022 using Medline and PubMed databases. Additional papers were identified from colleagues. Study selection was according to PECO inclusion criteria. Studies were evaluated against the WHO checklist for risk of bias.

Results: 52 publications, 36 published after 2015, were identified that assessed associations between transportation noise and cardiovascular outcomes, that also considered potential confounding (49 studies) or interaction (23 studies) by air pollution. Most, but not all studies, suggested that the associations between traffic noise and cardiovascular outcomes are independent of air pollution. NO2 or PM2.5 were the most commonly included air pollutants and we observed no clear differences across air pollutants in terms of the potential confounding role. Most papers did not appear to suggest an interaction between noise and air pollution. Eight studies found the largest noise effect estimates occurring within the higher noise and air pollution exposure categories, but were not often statistically significant.

Conclusion: Whilst air pollution does not appear to confound associations of noise and cardiovascular health, more studies on potential interactions are needed. Current methods to assess quality of evidence are not optimal when evaluating evidence on confounding or interaction.

Keywords: Air pollution; Cardiovascular; Confounding; Interaction; Multi-pollutant; Noise pollution.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Air Pollutants* / analysis
  • Air Pollution* / adverse effects
  • Databases, Factual
  • Environmental Exposure / analysis
  • Noise, Transportation* / adverse effects
  • Particulate Matter / analysis

Substances

  • Air Pollutants
  • Particulate Matter