Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major pregnancy complication affecting approximately 14.0% of pregnancies around the world. Air pollution exposure, particularly exposure to PM2.5, has become a major environmental issue affecting health, especially for vulnerable pregnant women. Associations between PM2.5 exposure and adverse birth outcomes are generally assumed to be the same throughout a large geographical area. However, the effects of air pollution on health can very spatially in subpopulations. Such spatially varying effects are likely due to a wide range of contextual neighborhood and individual factors that are spatially correlated, including SES, demographics, exposure to housing characteristics and due to different composition of particulate matter from different emission sources. This combination of elevated environmental hazards in conjunction with socioeconomic-based disparities forms what has been described as a "double jeopardy" for marginalized sub-populations. In this manuscript our analysis combines both an examination of spatially varying effects of a) unit-changes in exposure and examines effects of b) changes from current exposure levels down to a fixed compliance level, where compliance levels correspond to the Air Quality Standards (AQS) set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guideline values. Results suggest that exposure reduction policies should target certain "hotspot" areas where size and effects of potential reductions will reap the greatest rewards in terms of health benefits, such as areas of southeast Los Angeles County which experiences high levels of PM2.5 exposures and consist of individuals who may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of air pollution on the risk of GDM.
Keywords: Air pollution exposures; Bayesian modeling, multi-level models; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Spatially varying effects.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.