Serum Pancreatic Stone Protein Reference Values in Healthy Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 29;12(9):3200. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093200.

Abstract

Background: In non-pregnant populations, pancreatic stone protein (PSP) has been reported to have a higher diagnostic performance for identifying severe inflammatory and infectious disease than other established biomarkers.

Objective: To generate reference values for serum PSP in pregnancy and compare them to the values of the general healthy population.

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Setting: A single center.

Population: Healthy women with singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Methods: This is a prospective single-center cohort study. Between 2013 and 2021, samples of 5 mL peripheral blood were drawn from 440 healthy pregnant women. Therein, 393 cases were singletons and 47 were multiple pregnancies. Serum PSP levels were measured by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The main outcome measures were serum PSP level (ng/mL) reference values in healthy pregnant women.

Results: The mean PSP reference values in women with singleton pregnancies were 7.9 ± 2.6 ng/mL (95% CI; 2.69-13.03 ng/mL). The PSP values in women with multiple pregnancies (9.17 ± 3.06 ng/mL (95% CI; 3.05-15.28 ng/mL)) were significantly higher (p = 0.001). The PSP values in the first trimester (6.94 ± 2.53 ng/mL) were lower compared to the second (7.42 ± 2.21 ng/mL) and third trimesters (8.33 ± 2.68 ng/mL, p = 0.0001). Subgroup analyses in singletons revealed no correlations between PSP values, maternal characteristics, and pre-existing medical conditions.

Conclusion: The PSP values in healthy pregnant women (4-12 ng/mL) were in the range of the reference values of the general healthy population (8-16 ng/mL). This insight blazes a trail for further clinical studies on the use of PSP as a potential novel biomarker for the early detection of pregnancy-related diseases such as chorioamnionitis.

Keywords: PSP; pancreatic stone protein; pregnancy; reference values.

Grants and funding

The study was supported by the Gebert Rüf Foundation granted to RG. This is strictly a non-profit foundation. The foundation decided to fund our project in 2012. Our funding application at the Geberet Rüf Foundation underwent an external review process with scientists who are experts in this field.