Risk Factors and Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Wound Infections after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3175. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093175.

Abstract

Background and study aim: The incidence of wound infections after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) varies widely in recent studies. The present study systematically investigates the underlying risk factors for the development of wound infections in a large cohort of patients over a long-term follow-up period.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PEG insertion using either the pull or push technique was conducted and patients followed up for 3 years. Tube-related wound infections were identified, and pathogens regularly cultured from wound swabs. Adjusted analysis was performed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: 616 patients were included in this study. A total of 25% percent of patients developed wound infections upon PEG tube insertion and 6.5% showed recurrent infections. Nicotine abuse (p = 0.01), previous ischemic stroke (p = 0.01) and head and neck cancer (p < 0.001) showed an increased risk for wound infection after PEG placement. Moreover, radio-chemotherapy was associated with the occurrence of wound infections (p < 0.001). Infection rates were similar between pull and push cohorts. The most common bacterial pathogen detected was Enterobacterales (19.2%). Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci were frequently detected in recurrent infection (14.2%, 11.4% and 9.6%, respectively). Antibiotic prophylaxis showed no effect on infection rates.

Conclusions: Wound infections after PEG placement are common and occasionally occur as recurrent infections. There is potential for improvement in everyday clinical practice, particularly regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in accordance with guidelines.

Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis; head and neck cancer; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG); radio-chemotherapy; wound infection.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.