Background: Hand surgeons sometimes place more weight on clinical findings and may not always consider the results of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The aim of this study is to determine factors associated with a change in diagnosis of CTS after EDX. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all patients with an initial clinical diagnosis of CTS who underwent EDX at our hospital. We identified patients whose diagnosis changed from CTS to non-CTS after EDX and used univariate and multivariate analysis to determine if age, sex, hand dominance, unilateral symptoms, history of diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, haemodialysis, cerebral lesion, cervical lesion, mental disorder, initial diagnosis by a non-hand surgeon, the number of examined items in CTS-6 and a CTS-negative EDX result were associated with a change in diagnosis after EDX. Results: A total of 479 hands with a clinical diagnosis of CTS underwent EDX. The diagnosis was changed to non-CTS in 61 hands (13%) after EDX. Univariate analysis demonstrated that unilateral symptoms, cervical lesion, mental disorder, initial diagnosis by a non-hand surgeon, the number of examined items and a CTS-negative EDX result were significantly associated with a change in diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, only the number of examined items was significantly associated with a change in diagnosis. Conclusions: EDX results were particularly valued in hands where the initial diagnosis was uncertain for CTS. In hands with an initial diagnosis of CTS, the performance of sufficient history-taking and physical examination was more valued at the final diagnosis than EDX results or other aspects of the patient's background. The process of confirming a clear initial clinical diagnosis of CTS using EDX may be of little value for decision-making at the final diagnosis. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).
Keywords: CTS-6 score; Carpal tunnel syndrome; Diagnosis; Electrodiagnostic study; Predictive factor.