Introduction: The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the methods we employ to build a foundation of diversity, quality and inclusion within the American Board of Urology and its certifying processes.
Methods: The American Board of Urology consists of 3 major committees: the Trustees of the Board and the Written and Oral Exam Committees. Yearly, before selecting new members to these committees, a Gap analysis is performed to evaluate discrepancies between the committee structure and the constituents we serve. The selection of new committee members is based on both the individual's merit and an attempt to match or supersede the diversity ratios described within the most current national census conducted by the American Urological Association.
Results: This year's evaluation revealed our committee structure consisting of 85% (98/115) male and 15% (17/115) women: National Census 90% and 10% respectively. Regarding race and ethnicity, White nonHispanic: 74% (85/115) compared to 81% (National Census); Hispanic: 1% (1/115) compared to 4%; Asian: 22% (25/115) compared to 12%; Black/African American 3% (4/115) compared to 2%.
Conclusions: The American Board of Urology recognizes that the evaluation of ratios is an excellent initial step to establish diversity; however, ratios alone may not change behavior or attitudes. To reach our eventual goal, we must include educational efforts that inform our diplomates and committee members regarding the benefits of diversity. We also acknowledge that establishing and maintaining diversity within any governing board is an imperative that requires continuous and structural processes to be sustained.
Keywords: cultural diversity; specialty boards; urology.