Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus HLA-Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplantation: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101

Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):464.e1-464.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.017. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

Abstract

BMT CTN 1101 was a Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing reduced-intensity conditioning followed by double unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow transplantation (haplo-BMT) for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Here we report the results of a parallel cost-effectiveness analysis of these 2 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) techniques. In this study, 368 patients were randomized to unrelated UCBT (n = 186) or haplo-BMT (n = 182). We estimated healthcare utilization and costs using propensity score-matched haplo-BMT recipients from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse for trial participants age <65 years and Medicare claims for participants age ≥65 years. Weibull models were used to estimate 20-year survival. EQ-5D surveys by trial participants were used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). At a 5-year follow-up, survival was 42% for haplo-BMT recipients versus 36% for UCBT recipients (P = .06). Over a 20-year time horizon, haplo-BMT is expected to be more effective (+.63 QALY) and more costly (+$118,953) for persons age <65 years. For those age ≥65 years, haplo-BMT is expected to be more effective and less costly. In one-way uncertainty analyses, for persons age <65, the cost per QALY result was most sensitive to life-years and health state utilities, whereas for those age ≥65, life- years were more influential than costs and health state utilities. Compared to UCBT, haplo-BMT was moderately more cost-effective for patients age <65 years and less costly and more effective for persons age ≥65 years. Haplo-BMT is a fair value choice for commercially insured patients with high-risk leukemia and lymphoma who require HCT. For Medicare enrollees, haplo-BMT is a preferred choice when considering costs and outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01597778.

Keywords: Bone marrow; Cord blood; Cost-effectiveness; Haploidentical; Transplantation.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation / methods
  • Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / methods
  • Humans
  • Medicare
  • United States

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01597778