Understanding the experience in the healthcare system of non-migrant and migrant frequent users of the emergency department in French-speaking Switzerland: a comparative qualitative study

Carmen Cariello; Véronique S Grazioli; Justin Nikles; Elodie Schmutz; Olivier Hugli; Patrick Bodenmann

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069272

Understanding the experience in the healthcare system of non-migrant and migrant frequent users of the emergency department in French-speaking Switzerland: a comparative qualitative study

BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 24;13(4):e069272. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069272.

Authors

Carmen Cariello¹, Véronique S Grazioli², Justin Nikles², Elodie Schmutz², Olivier Hugli³, Patrick Bodenmann²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Vulnerabilities and Social Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Chair of Medicine for Vulnerable Populations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland carmen.cariello@unil.ch.
² Department of Vulnerabilities and Social Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Chair of Medicine for Vulnerable Populations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
³ Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background: Previous research revealed the vulnerability of frequent users of emergency department (FUED) because of concomitant medical, psychological and social issues. Case management (CM) provides FUED with effective medical and social support, however, the heterogeneity of this population has highlighted the need to explore the specific needs of FUED subpopulations. In response, this study aimed to explore qualitatively the lived experience of migrant and non-migrant FUED in the healthcare system to identify unmet needs.

Methods: Adult migrant and non-migrant FUED (≥ 5 visits in the ED in the past 12 months) were recruited in a Swiss university hospital to collect qualitative data on their experience within the Swiss health system. Participants were selected based on predefined quotas for gender and age. Researchers conducted one-on-one semistructured interviews until reaching data saturation. Inductive conventional content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.

Results: In total, 23 semistructured interviews were conducted (11 migrant FUED and 12 non-migrant FUED). Four main themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) self-evaluation of the Swiss healthcare system; (2) orientation within the healthcare system; (3) relationship with caregivers and (4) perception of own health. While both groups were overall satisfied with the healthcare system and care provided, migrant FUED reported language and financial barriers to access it. Both groups expressed overall satisfaction over their relationship with healthcare professionals, although migrant FUED reported a feeling of illegitimacy to consult the ED based on social status, whereas non-migrant FUED felt more often the need to justify their use of the ED. Finally, migrant FUED perceived their own health to be affected by their status.

Conclusion: This study highlighted difficulties specific to subpopulations of FUED. For migrant FUED, these included access to care and impact of migrant status on own health. Adapting CM to the specific needs of migrant FUED could help reduce their vulnerability.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adult
Delivery of Health Care
Emergency Service, Hospital*
Humans
Language
Qualitative Research
Switzerland
Transients and Migrants*