Background: Despite efforts to use standardized taxonomy and research reporting, documenting implementation strategies utilized in community settings remains challenging. This case study demonstrates a practical approach to gather use of and satisfaction with implementation strategies utilized within community-based sites to understand community providers' perspectives of implementing an early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for children on the autism spectrum across different settings.
Methods: Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, survey and interview data were collected from directors/supervisors and direct providers (n = 26) across three sites (one university and two community-based replication sites). The Implementation Strategies and Satisfaction Survey (ISSS) was administered to identify staff-reported implementation strategy use and satisfaction. Informed by quantitative results, follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subsample (n = 13) to further understand staff experiences with endorsed implementation strategies and elicit recommendations for future efforts.
Results: Survey results were used to demonstrate frequencies of implementation strategies endorsed by site and role. Overall, staff felt satisfied with implementation strategies used within their agencies. Content analysis of qualitative data revealed three salient themes related to implementation strategy use-context, communication, and successes and challenges-providing in-depth detail on how strategies were utilized, and strategy effectiveness based on community providers' experiences. Recommendations were also elicited to improve strategy use within "broader" community settings.
Conclusions: The project demonstrated a practical approach to identifying and evaluating implementation strategies used within sites delivering autism services. Reporting implementation strategies using the ISSS can provide insight into community providers' perspectives and satisfaction with agency implementation strategy use that can generate more relevant and responsive strategies to address barriers in community settings. Plain language abstract Examining community providers' preferences and experiences with implementation strategies used to facilitate evidence-based practice uptake can broaden our understanding of what, how, and why implementation strategies work in community-based settings ( Chaudoir et al., 2013; Leeman et al., 2017; Proctor et al., 2013). Such efforts have great potential to tailor implementation strategies to address barriers/facilitators typically found in community-based settings.This case study demonstrates a practical approach using mixed methodology to: (a) gather self-reported use of and satisfaction with implementation strategies to understand community providers' perspectives of implementation strategy success. Using a new survey, the Implementation Strategies and Satisfaction Survey (ISSS) conjoined with interviews, the study demonstrated a practical approach using standardized language to report strategies used in one university-based site and two community-based replication sites that deliver an early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for children on the autism spectrum. This paper contributes to one of the five priorities to enhance public health impact-improve tracking and reporting of implementation strategies utilized when translating research into practice ( Dingfelder & Mandell, 2011; Powell et al., 2019; Stahmer et al., 2019). This approach emphasizes the importance of understanding context (e.g., community organizations providing services to children on the autism spectrum) to develop strategies that work better for EIBI implementation and scale-up. Understanding community provider's preferences and experiences with implementation strategies can support use of implementation strategies that better fit usual care contexts, with the ultimate goal of improving implementation practice in community-based settings.
Keywords: autism; community providers; community-based settings; early intensive behavioral interventions; implementation strategies; mixed methods.
© The Author(s) 2021.