Stream nitrate enrichment and increased light yet no algal response following forest harvest and experimental manipulation of headwater riparian zones

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284590. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Disturbances to forested watersheds often result in increases of nutrients and light to nearby streams. Such changes are generally expected to produce a shift to a more autotrophic aquatic ecosystem, with measurable increases in algae, and associated implications for food webs and fisheries. Although this paradigm is widely established, results from our 10-year study (2007-2016) in 12 headwater streams and four sites downstream in the Trask River Watershed (Oregon, USA), did not concur. In 2012, one watershed was thinned, three were clearcut harvested with variable buffers and three with uniform riparian buffers. After harvest, light to the stream surface significantly increased at the three watersheds with variable buffers while dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) significantly increased in all of the clearcut harvested streams. Despite the increase in DIN and light, algal standing stocks and chlorophyll a concentrations did not significantly increase. The common assumption of increased autotrophic responses in stream food webs following increases of nitrogen and light was not supported here. We postulate the co-limitation of nutrients, driven by low phosphorus concentrations, which unlike DIN did not increase post-harvest, and the characteristics of the algal community, which were dominated by low light adapted diatoms rather than green algae, contributed to our findings of no responses for standing stocks of epilithic algae or concentrations of chlorophyll a. The inclusion of multiple statistical analyses provided more certainty around our findings. This study documents responses to current forest practices and provides cautionary information for management and restoration activities aiming to increase fish abundance and standing stocks by opening riparian canopies and adding nutrients.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Chlorophyll A
  • Ecosystem*
  • Forests
  • Nitrates* / analysis
  • Nitrogen / analysis
  • Organic Chemicals

Substances

  • Nitrates
  • Chlorophyll A
  • Organic Chemicals
  • Nitrogen

Grants and funding

Support for the Trask River Watershed Study was primarily provided through the Oregon State University Watershed Research Cooperative, with long-term base funding from the Oregon Department of Forestry and Weyerhaeuser Corporation. Additional funding was provided by US Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, US Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board. The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors [SLJ, AA, LRA, RJB], but did not have any additional roles in the decisions about data collection, data analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript and decision to publish.