Stress intensity factor of a cracked molar restored with different materials and designs: A 3D-FEA

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jun:142:105818. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105818. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

Abstract

Objective: This work used 3D finite element analysis (FEA) to analyze and directly compare the stress intensity factor (SIF) and stress distribution at the crack tip of identical cracked tooth models restored with different materials and crown parameters.

Methods: A 3D model of the cracked tooth was generated. Then, we applied 25 restorative models, including three parameters (shoulder height, width, and degree of polymerization), five restorative materials (GC, IPS, LU, ZC, VE), and two combinations of types of cement (RMGIC and GIC). An occlusal load of 800N was applied to the spherical part along the longitudinal axis. The stress distribution of the preparation and the SIF of the crack tip was analyzed.

Results: The crack tip SIF was minimal for a shoulder height offset of 0.8 mm (P = 0.032), a shoulder width of 0.6 mm (P = 0.045), a crown material of ZC (P < 2e-16), and a cement material of RMGIC (P < 0.05), respectively. In contrast, the effect of different polymerization degrees on SIF was insignificant (P = 0.95).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the selection of a larger modulus of elasticity (MOE) material for the crown, the preparation of a smaller shoulder width within a safe range, a reasonable increase in the crown length, and the selection of adhesive materials with high fracture toughness are favorable methods to prevent further crack extension.

Keywords: Cracked propagation; Cracked tooth; Crown parameters; Finite element analysis; Restoration design; Stress intensity factor.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Crowns*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Elasticity
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Materials Testing
  • Molar*

Substances

  • Glass Ionomer Cements