The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes

Audrey Ruple; Jan M Sargeant; Laura E Selmic; Annette M O'Connor

doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1137774

The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes

Front Vet Sci. 2023 Mar 30:10:1137774. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1137774. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Audrey Ruple¹, Jan M Sargeant², Laura E Selmic³, Annette M O'Connor⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
² Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
³ Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
⁴ Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Abstract

Background: Reporting of clinical trials conducted in client- and shelter-owned dog and cat populations is not optimal, which inhibits the ability to assess the reliability and validity of trial findings and precludes the ability to include some trials in evidence synthesis.

Objective: To develop a reporting guideline for parallel group and crossover trials that addresses the unique features and reporting requirements for trials conducted in client- and shelter-owned dog and cat populations.

Design: Consensus statement.

Setting: Virtual.

Participants: Fifty-six experts from North America, the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia working in academia, government (research and regulatory agencies), industry, and clinical veterinary practice.

Methods: A steering committee created a draft checklist for reporting criteria based upon the CONSORT statement and the CONSORT extensions for reporting of abstracts and crossover trials. Each item was presented to the expert participants and was modified and presented again until >85% of participants were in agreement about the inclusion and wording of each item in the checklist.

Results: The final PetSORT checklist consists of 25 main items with several sub-items. Most items were modifications of items contained in the CONSORT 2010 checklist or the CONSORT extension for crossover trials, but 1 sub-item pertaining to euthanasia was created de novo.

Conclusion: The methods and processes used to develop this guideline represent a novel departure from those used to create other reporting guidelines, by using a virtual format. The use of the PetSORT statement should improve reporting of trials conducted in client- and shelter-owned dogs and cats and published in the veterinary research literature.

Keywords: animal health; animal reporting guideline; companion animals; randomized trials; small animal clinical trials.