Introduction: Significant advances have been made in the first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) since the approval of immune-based combinations, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab or cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus axitinib or lenvatinib.
Areas covered: The aim of this review is to compare the different safety profiles of first-line immune-based combinations versus sunitinib across the four respective pivotal trials (CheckMate 214, CheckMate 9ER, KEYNOTE-426, and CLEAR), with a particular attention to patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment.
Expert opinion: The concurrent use of an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as a first-line treatment strategy for mRCC has highlighted the unmet clinical need for prompt detection and consequently proper management of adverse events (AEs), both immune-related and TKI-induced. Overlapping AEs, such as hypertransaminasemia, are most challenging to manage, and evidence is still outlined from clinical practice. The specific patterns of toxicities of the approved first-line immune-based combinations, along with the impact of these interventions on patients' HRQoL, demand a deeper consideration by physicians while choosing the appropriate treatment for each individual mRCC patient. Both safety profile and HRQoL evaluation could be exploited to guide the first-line treatment selection in this setting.
Keywords: Adverse events; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immune-based combinations; immune-related adverse events; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life; safety.