Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato 'Miniplum' Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons

Alessio V Tallarita; Lorenzo Vecchietti; Nadezhda A Golubkina; Agnieszka Sekara; Eugenio Cozzolino; Massimo Mirabella; Antonio Cuciniello; Roberto Maiello; Vincenzo Cenvinzo; Pasquale Lombardi; Gianluca Caruso

doi:10.3390/plants12071423

Effects of Plant Biostimulation Time Span and Soil Electrical Conductivity on Greenhouse Tomato 'Miniplum' Yield and Quality in Diverse Crop Seasons

Plants (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;12(7):1423. doi: 10.3390/plants12071423.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
² Hydro Fert S.r.l., 76121 Barletta, Italy.
³ Analytical Laboratory Department, Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, Odintsovo District, Vniissok, Selectsionnaya 14, Moscow 143072, Russia.
⁴ Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture, 31-120 Krakow, Poland.
⁵ Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA)-Research Center for Cereal and Industrial Crops, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
⁶ Centro Studi Isvam, Association for Innovation and Development of Sustainable Mediterranean Agriculture, 90121 Palermo, Italy.
⁷ Research Center for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, 84098 Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy.

Abstract

Biostimulants help plants cope with environmental stresses and improve vegetable yield and quality. This study was conducted to determine the protein hydrolysate (PH) effect of three different durations (weekly applications: three, six, or nine times plus an untreated control) in factorial combination with four soil electrical conductivities (EC: 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mS·cm^-1) on yield, fruit quality, and elemental composition of tomato 'miniplum' grown in a greenhouse. Fruit yield was best affected, during the summer, by six and nine biostimulant applications at EC 3.0 mS·cm^-1, and in the same season, the six treatments led to the highest fruit number with no difference compared to nine applications; during the winter, the three and six treatments improved the mentioned variables at each EC level. Fruits' dry residue and Brix^o were positively affected by biostimulation both in summer and winter. In summer, the 6.0 mS·cm^-1 EC led to the highest dry residue and Brix^o values, though the latter did not show any significant difference compared to 4.5 mS·cm^-1; in winter, the best results corresponded to 4.5 and 6.0 mS·cm^-1. A higher beneficial effect of PH on fruit antioxidant status, i.e., lycopene, polyphenols, ascorbic acid levels, and lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) activity, was recorded in winter compared with summer. Positive correlations between polyphenols and LAA, as well as ascorbic acid content and HAA were found for all EC and PH treatments. Most of the mineral elements tested demonstrated concentration stability, whereas the highest EC decreased P, Mg, Cu, and Se accumulation. The opposite effect was shown by PH application on Se and Mn levels, with P tending to increase. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Cu were the lowest under the longest duration of PH supply. These results further confirm the essential role of plant biostimulation in enhancing tomato yield and quality, with a particular focus on the treatment duration.

Keywords: Solanum lycopersicum L.; antioxidant activity; ascorbic acid; firmness; greenhouse; lycopene; mineral composition; phenolics; protein hydrolysate.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.