Effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness and microbial adhesion on highly-filled composites for injectable mold technique

Stefan Vulović; Jovana N Stašić; Jugoslav Ilić; Miloš Todorović; Danimir Jevremović; Aleksandra Milić-Lemić

doi:10.1111/jerd.13045

Effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness and microbial adhesion on highly-filled composites for injectable mold technique

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Sep;35(6):917-926. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13045. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Authors

Stefan Vulović¹, Jovana N Stašić², Jugoslav Ilić³, Miloš Todorović⁴, Danimir Jevremović⁵, Aleksandra Milić-Lemić¹

Affiliations

¹ University of Belgrade, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, Belgrade, Serbia.
² University of Belgrade, School of Dental Medicine, DentalNet Research Group, Belgrade, Serbia.
³ University of Belgrade, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Restorative Odontology and Endodontics, Belgrade, Serbia.
⁴ University of Belgrade, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Belgrade, Serbia.
⁵ University Business Academy, School of Dentistry, Pančevo, Serbia.

PMID: 37039335
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13045

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness and microbial adhesion and viability of Streptococcus mutans on novel highly-filled composites for injectable mold technique.

Materials and methods: One hundred sixty specimens were divided into four material groups: FSF (Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative), TE (Tetric EvoFlow), GUI (G-aenial Universal Injectable) and GUF (G-aenial Universal Flo). Within each group, specimens were split regarding finishing and polishing (F/P) procedures into: SLD (Sof-Lex Discs), SLS (Sof-Lex Spirals), OG (OneGloss) and PG (PoGo). Surface roughness was analyzed using profilometer (Ra and Rz) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Strep. mutans biofilm formation was analyzed using colony forming unit (CFU) and cell viability assay. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for comparison among groups, Pearson's coefficient was applied for the correlation between Ra and CFU/ml and all data were presented as mean ± SD.

Results: Both materials and F/P procedures affect Ra, Rz and Strep. mutans CFU/ml values (p ≤ 0.05). Considering the Ra and Rz, GUI and GUF revealed lower values, compared to FSF and TE and SLD and SLS revealed lower values, compared to OG and PG. Considering the Strep. mutans CFU/ml and viability, GUI and TE presented lower values, compared to GUF and FSF and SLD and SLS presented lower values, compared to OG and PG. Moderate positive correlation was found between Ra and CFU/ml (r = 0.552).

Conclusions: The smoothest surfaces possess GUI and GUF, among materials and SLD and SLS, among F/P procedures. GUI adhered the lowest amount of Strep. mutans, due to the smoothest surfaces. FSF and GUF revealed the highest amount of Strep. mutans, due to bis-GMA, bis-MEPP and TEGDMA in their composition.

Clinical significance: The findings of the present study may be beneficial for the proper selection of highly-filled composites and an adequate finishing and polishing procedure when performing the injectable mold composite resin veneer technique.

Keywords: CFU; MTT; SEM; flowable composites; injectable technique; surface roughness.

MeSH terms

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Composite Resins
Dental Polishing* / methods
Dental Restoration, Permanent* / methods
Materials Testing
Surface Properties

Substances

Composite Resins
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate