Dose mimicking based strategies for online adaptive proton therapy of head and neck cancer

E Borderias-Villarroel; A Fredriksson; S Cvilic; D Di Perri; E Longton; J Pierrard; X Geets; E Sterpin

doi:10.1088/1361-6560/accb38

Dose mimicking based strategies for online adaptive proton therapy of head and neck cancer

Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 2;68(10). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/accb38.

Authors

E Borderias-Villarroel¹, A Fredriksson², S Cvilic^{3

4}, D Di Perri³, E Longton³, J Pierrard^{1

3}, X Geets^{1

3}, E Sterpin^{1

5}

Affiliations

¹ UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
² RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden.
³ Radiation oncology department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
⁴ Radiation oncology department, Clinique Saint-Jean, Brussels, Belgium.
⁵ KULeuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of external radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium.

PMID: 37023774
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/accb38

Abstract

Objective.To compare a not adapted (NA) robust planning strategy with three fully automated online adaptive proton therapy (OAPT) workflows based on the same optimization method: dose mimicking (DM). The added clinical value and limitations of the OAPT methods are investigated for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.Approach.The three OAPT strategies aimed at compensating for inter-fractional anatomical changes by mimiking different dose distributions on corrected cone beam CT images (corrCBCTs). Order by complexity, the OAPTs were: (1) online adaptive dose restoration (OADR) where the approved clinical dose on the planning-CT (pCT) was mimicked, (2) online adaptation using DM of the deformed clinical dose from the pCT to corrCBCTs (OADEF), and (3) online adaptation applying DM to a predicted dose on corrCBCTs (OAML). Adaptation was only applied in fractions where the target coverage criteria were not met (D98% < 95% of the prescribed dose). For 10 HNC patients, the accumulated dose distributions over the 35 fractions were calculated for NA, OADR, OADEF, and OAML.Main results.Higher target coverage was observed for all OAPT strategies compared to no adaptation. OADEF and OAML outperformed both NA and OADR and were comparable in terms of target coverage to initial clinical plans. However, only OAML provided comparable NTCP values to those from the clinical dose without statistically significant differences. When the NA initial plan was evaluated on corrCBCTs, 51% of fractions needed adaptation. The adaptation rate decreased significantly to 25% when the last adapted plan with OADR was selected for delivery, to 16% with OADEF, and to 21% with OAML. The reduction was even greater when the best plan among previously generated adapted plans (instead of the last one) was selected.Significance. The implemented OAPT strategies provided superior target coverage compared to no adaptation, higher OAR sparing, and fewer required adaptations.

Keywords: adaptive proton therapy; dose mimicking; online adaptation; online adaptive proton therapy; robust dose mimicking.

MeSH terms

Head and Neck Neoplasms*
Humans
Organs at Risk
Proton Therapy* / methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated* / methods