Background: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is currently the preferred treatment method for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The effectiveness of this strategy in returning patients to premorbid function has recently been challenged. In a review of 18,535 PJI knee patients, 38% did not undergo reimplantation. In another review of 18,156 hip and knee PJI patients, 43% did not undergo reimplantation. These disturbing statistics led us to ask whether treatment at a specialized PJI center could improve the rate of reimplantation compared to the previously noted studies from large national administrative databases.
Methods: A retrospective review of our registry was performed to identify 390 patients who underwent a two-stage exchange after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty who had a confirmed chronic bacterial PJI, defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, from January 2010 through December 2019. Variables included number of joints resected, number reimplanted, and the number not reimplanted.
Results: Of the 390 patients undergoing 2-stage treatment, 386 of 390 (99%) were reimplanted and 4 of 390 (1%) were not reimplanted due to medical issues.
Conclusion: We have shown that 2-stage treatment at a PJI center significantly improves the rate of reimplantation. A specialized PJI center with experienced revision surgeons doing high volume infection procedures complemented by infectious disease and medical consultants familiar with the special needs of PJI patients may be advantageous. A national network of such centers may have the ability to improve outcomes, standardize treatment protocols, and allow for collaborative research.
Keywords: periprosthetic joint infection; reimplantation; revision total hip arthroplasty; revision total knee arthroplasty; two-stage exchange.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.