Hunting Drosophila viruses from wild populations: A novel isolation approach and characterisation of viruses

PLoS Pathog. 2023 Mar 30;19(3):e1010883. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010883. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Metagenomic studies have demonstrated that viruses are extremely diverse and abundant in insects, but the difficulty of isolating them means little is known about the biology of these newly discovered viruses. To overcome this challenge in Drosophila, we created a cell line that was more permissive to infection and detected novel viruses by the presence of double-stranded RNA. We demonstrate the utility of these tools by isolating La Jolla virus (LJV) and Newfield virus (NFV) from several wild Drosophila populations. These viruses have different potential host ranges, with distinct abilities to replicate in five Drosophila species. Similarly, in some species they cause high mortality and in others they are comparatively benign. In three species, NFV but not LJV caused large declines in female fecundity. This sterilization effect was associated with differences in tissue tropism, as NFV but not LJV was able to infect Drosophila melanogaster follicular epithelium and induce follicular degeneration in the ovary. We saw a similar effect in the invasive pest of fruit crops Drosophila suzukii, where oral infection with NFV caused reductions in the fecundity, suggesting it has potential as a biocontrol agent. In conclusion, a simple protocol allowed us to isolate new viruses and demonstrate that viruses identified by metagenomics have a large effect on the fitness of the model organism D. melanogaster and related species.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • Drosophila*
  • Female
  • Insecta
  • Viruses*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Leverhulme Trust grant RPG-2020-236 to FJ. G.B.-M. was supported by SENACYT-IFARHU. CSC is funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grants 2019/03997-2 and 2021/13166-0. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.