There have been several studies on the use of the Verhoeff van Gieson staining method to demonstrate thermal effects on tissues. However, this method has rarely been used for the analysis of periodontal tissues. This study was undertaken to compare the quality and effectiveness of the Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG) staining method with conventional hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) in measuring the thermal effects in gingival tissues. Periodontal tissues around bovine mandibular teeth were treated using different surgical lasers (wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 970 nm, and 445 nm) at 2 W power setting. Measurements of the depth of the coagulation zone were recorded for all treatment groups in sample tissues stained with H&E as well as the VVG-staining method. Measures were interpreted by a trained pathologist. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between values recorded for the light penetration depth on tissues stained with each of the two staining methods. It was determined that there was no significant difference in the recorded values (P = 0.23). We have concluded that the VVG-stained tissues were better able to visualize the depth of thermal damage and thus may make it easier for someone not well trained to interpret the depth of light penetration in these tissues.
Keywords: Gingiva; Verhoeff van Gieson stain; hematoxylin & eosin; histology.