Analysing interventions designed to reduce tuberculosis-related stigma: A scoping review

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;2(10):e0000989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000989. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Stigma is a critical barrier for TB care delivery; yet data on stigma reduction interventions is limited. This review maps the available literature on TB stigma reduction interventions, using the Health Stigma and Discrimination framework and an implementation analysis to identify research gaps and inform intervention design. Using search terms for TB and stigma, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers screened all abstracts, full-texts, extracted data, conducted a quality assessment, and assessed implementation. Results were categorized by socio-ecological level, then sub-categorized by the stigma driver or manifestation targeted. After screening 1865 articles, we extracted data from nine. Three studies were implemented at the individual and interpersonal level using a combination of TB clubs and interpersonal support to target internal and anticipated stigma among persons with TB. Two studies were implemented at the interpersonal level using counselling or a video based informational tool delivered to households to reduce stigma drivers and manifestations. Three studies were implemented at the organizational level, targeting drivers of stigma among healthcare workers (HW) and enacted stigma among HWs. One study was implemented at the community level using an educational campaign for community members. Stakeholder consultation emphasized the importance of policy level interventions and education on the universality of risk to destigmatize TB. Review findings suggest that internal and anticipated TB stigma may be addressed effectively with interventions targeted towards individuals using counselling or support groups. In contrast, enacted TB stigma may be better addressed with information-based interventions implemented at the organizational or community level. Policy level interventions were absent but identified as critical by stakeholders. Implementation barriers included the lack of high-quality training and integration with mental health services. Three key gaps must be addressed in future research: consistent stigma definitions, standardized stigma measurement, and measurement of implementation outcomes.

Grants and funding

This work was funded by a Stop TB Partnership Challenge Facility for Civil Society Round 9 grant, awarded to TB Proof. IF is supported by an International Development Research Centre Scholar Award. RRN is supported by National Institutes of Health Career Development Award (NIAID K23 AI132648-04) and an American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Burroughs Wellcome Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.