Measurement of the gluteal compartment pressures: A cadaveric study describing safety and reproducibility of two methods

Andrew D Posner; Afshin A Anoushiravani; Eric M Perloff; Khushdeep S Vig; Michael P Smith; Michael T Mulligan

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.017

Measurement of the gluteal compartment pressures: A cadaveric study describing safety and reproducibility of two methods

Injury. 2023 Mar 12:S0020-1383(23)00270-X. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.017. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Andrew D Posner¹, Afshin A Anoushiravani¹, Eric M Perloff¹, Khushdeep S Vig¹, Michael P Smith², Michael T Mulligan¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
² Department of Anatomy, Anatomical Simulation and Research, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.

PMID: 36959021
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.017

Abstract

Introduction: Gluteal compartment syndrome is an uncommon entity and physicians may use intracompartmental pressure measurements for confirmation of the clinical diagnosis, or in cases where the physical exam is indeterminate. However, there is a paucity of literature describing a safe and reproducible technique to measure gluteal intracompartmental pressures during the diagnosis of gluteal compartment syndrome. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to evaluate the sole previous technique described in the literature to measure gluteal intracompartmental pressures and provide a modified technique which can be safely and reliably utilized clinically.

Methods: A cadaveric study with three phases was performed in 16 gluteal regions in 8 cadavers. In the first phase, the previously described technique was assessed. In the second phase, a modified set of techniques was created and evaluated. In the third phase, inter-user reliability of the modified set of techniques was assessed and calculated using Cohen's ĸ coefficient. In all three phases, methylene blue was injected through pressure monitoring needles into the gluteus maximus (GMax), gluteus medius/minimus (GMM), and the tensor fascia lata (TFL) compartments. Following dissection, rate of successful penetration into each targeted compartment and distance from the neurovascular structures was recorded.

Results: The previously described set of techniques was found to be variable. The modified set of techniques was effective, successfully reaching the GMax, GMM, and TFL compartments in 100%, 100%, and 81% of attempts, respectively. Inter-user reliability was excellent (ĸ = 1) for the techniques to reach both the GMax and GMM compartments, and moderate (ĸ = 0.54) for the technique to reach the TFL compartment. Within the GMax, the pressure monitoring needle was at a mean of 5.4±0.6 cm, 4.1±0.7 cm, 6.4±0.5 cm from the sciatic nerve (SN), superior gluteal nerve (SGN), and inferior gluteal nerve (IGN), respectively. Within the GMM, the pressure monitoring needle was at a mean of 9.7±1.4 cm, 7.4±1.3 cm, 11.1±1.7 cm from the SN, SGN, and IGN, respectively.

Conclusion: The modified set of techniques presented allows the three gluteal compartments to be safely and reproducibly reached to measure intracompartmental pressures during the diagnosis of gluteal compartment syndrome.

Keywords: Anatomic study; Cadaver study; Compartment syndrome; Gluteal; Intracompartmental pressure monitoring.