Objective: To evaluate the advantages and safety of Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization of lymphoma. Methods: Lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone were obtained. The clinical data, the success rate of stem cell collection, hematopoietic reconstitution, and treatment-related adverse reactions between the two groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 184 lymphoma patients were included in this analysis, including 115 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (62.5%) , 16 cases of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (8.7%) , 11 cases of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (6.0%) , 10 cases of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (5.4%) , 6 cases of mantle cell lymphoma (3.3%) , and 6 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 6 cases of NK/T-cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 4 cases of Burkitt's lymphoma (2.2%) , 8 cases of other types of B-cell lymphoma (4.3%) , and 2 cases of other types of T-cell lymphoma (1.1%) ; 31 patients had received radiotherapy (16.8%) . The patients in the two groups were recruited with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone. The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were basically similar. The patients in the Plerixafor in combination with the G-CSF mobilization group were older, and the number of recurrences and third-line chemotherapy was higher. 100 patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The success rate of the collection was 74.0% for one day and 89.0% for two days. 84 patients in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were recruited successfully with 85.7% for one day and 97.6% for two days. The success rate of mobilization in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was substantially higher than that in the group of G-CSF alone (P=0.023) . The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the mobilization group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was 3.9×10(6)/kg. The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the G-CSF Mobilization group alone was 3.2×10(6)/kg. The number of CD34(+) cells collected by Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was considerably higher than that in G-CSF alone (P=0.001) . The prevalent adverse reactions in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions (31.2%) and local skin redness (2.4%) . Conclusion: The success rate of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma patients treated with Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is significantly high. The success rate of collection and the absolute count of CD34(+) stem cells were substantially higher than those in the group treated with G-CSF alone. Even in older patients, second-line collection, recurrence, or multiple chemotherapies, the combined mobilization method also has a high success rate of mobilization.
目的： 分析普乐沙福（Plerixafor）联合粒细胞集落刺激因子（G-CSF）在淋巴瘤患者中进行自体造血干细胞动员的效果及安全性。 方法： 收集2019年4月至2021年12月在上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院采用普乐沙福联合G-CSF（普乐沙福+G-CSF组）或单用G-CSF（G-CSF组）进行自体造血干细胞动员的淋巴瘤患者，回顾性分析两组之间临床资料、干细胞动员/采集成功率、移植后造血重建和治疗不良反应。 结果： 全部184例淋巴瘤患者包括弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤115例（62.5%）、经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤16例（8.7%）、滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤11例（6.0%）、血管免疫母细胞T细胞淋巴瘤10例（5.4%）、套细胞淋巴瘤6例（3.3%）、间变大细胞淋巴瘤6例（3.3%）、NK/T细胞淋巴瘤6例（3.3%）、伯基特淋巴瘤4例（2.2%）、其他类型B细胞淋巴瘤8例（4.3%）、其他类型T细胞淋巴瘤2例（1.1%）。31例（16.8%）患者曾接受放疗。普乐沙福+G-CSF组84例，G-CSF组100例。普乐沙福+G-CSF组患者年龄较大、复发及三线化疗患者占比较高，其他临床特征基本一致。G-CSF组动员后1 d采集成功率为74.0%，2 d采集成功率为89.0%；普乐沙福+ G-CSF组1 d采集成功率为85.7%，2 d采集成功率为97.6%。普乐沙福+G-CSF组的动员成功率明显高于单用G-CSF组（P=0.023）。普乐沙福+G-CSF组、G-CSF组采集CD34(+)细胞中位数分别为3.9（0.7~21.2）×10(6)/kg、3.2（0.6~19.4）×10(6)/kg（P=0.001）。普乐沙福+G-CSF组常见的不良反应为1~2级胃肠道反应（31.2%）、局部皮肤发红（2.4%）。 结论： 普乐沙福联合G-CSF用于淋巴瘤患者自体造血干细胞动员/采集成功率、CD34(+)细胞采集量均明显高于单用G-CSF，不良反应少，即使在年龄较大、二线动员、复发或者多次化疗的患者中也具有较高的动员成功率。.
Keywords: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization; Granulocyte colony stimulating factor; Lymphoma; Plerixafor.