Integrating behavioural health and primary care: qualitative findings on contextual factors that influence integration

Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):768-775. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad029.

Abstract

Background: Integrating behavioural health care into primary care practices may increase patients' access to behavioural health services and improve health outcomes. However, few studies have explored factors that influence integration processes.

Objective: We sought to better understand contextual factors that support or impede behavioural health integration in primary care practices.

Methods: We conducted 71 semi-structured interviews with providers, staff, and leaders from eight primary care practices in the United States with integrated behavioural health services, which were participating in a randomized control, pragmatic trial: Integrating Behavioural Health and Primary Care. Practices were selected for diversity on geographic location, size, ownership, and experience with integration. We conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data derived from the interviews.

Results: We identified four categories of contextual factors influencing behavioural health integration: leadership commitment to integration, financial considerations, workflow and communication systems, and providers' perspectives on integration and team-based healthcare. Supportive factors included leaders' commitment to integration, adequate staffing, customized communication and workflow systems, collaborative practice culture, and healthy working relationships amongst providers. Impediments included staffing issues and payment models that do not reimburse for activities required to support integrated care.

Conclusion: Interviewees described various benefits of integration, including providers feeling better equipped to address patients' needs due to collaboration between medical and behavioural providers and resulting interdisciplinary learning. Given concerns about provider burnout, this finding warrants further study.

Keywords: behavioural medicine; consultation; internal medicine; multidisciplinary care; primary care; psychotherapy/counselling.

Plain language summary

This study examines the integration of behavioural health services, such as mental health counselling, into primary care practices. We conducted interviews with representatives from eight primary care practices with integrated behavioural health services. The participating practices are located in diverse geographic locations across the United States, and all were engaged in a large, national project entitled Integrating Behavioural Health and Primary Care. A total of 71 healthcare providers, staff, and practice leaders were interviewed and asked to discuss the factors that influenced efforts to integrate behavioural healthcare in their primary care practice. We analysed the interview transcripts and identified factors that supported or impeded behavioural health integration. Supportive factors included practice leaders’ commitment to integration, adequate staffing, customized communication and workflow systems within the practice, a collaborative practice culture, and healthy working relationships amongst the medical and behavioural health providers. Impediments included staffing issues and a lack of reimbursement from insurance companies and government payers for the time and effort that practice staff needs to devote in order to provide integrated care. Interviewees described various benefits of behavioural health integration, including providers feeling better equipped to address patients’ needs due to collaboration between medical and behavioural providers.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Humans
  • Learning*
  • Primary Health Care
  • United States