How message appeals and prior product use influence information processing, risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and genetic test purchase intentions

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0283102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283102. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Within the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test industry, attracting customers can be difficult especially due to the highly sensitive nature of these products. How these tests are communicated to consumers may be one avenue in which companies can impact customer purchase intentions. A 2 (message sidedness: one-way vs. two-way refutational) x 2 (hedging: present vs. absent) between-subjects experiment was conducted to understand how message features and prior product use influence information processing, risk and trust perceptions, and attitude toward the genetic test, which in turn, may influence direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test purchase intentions. Results demonstrated that having used a genetic test in the past predicted participants' trust in the company, information processing, and risk judgments; however, among those who used a genetic test, viewing a message that included hedging tended to increase their trust in the message. Trust in the message and company, information processing, and risk judgments significantly predicted participants' attitudes toward genetic testing, which in turn predicted their purchase intentions. The results suggest that in the context of DTC genetic test messaging, practitioners should strive to increase consumer trust in the message and the company and facilitate information processing, and they should work to diminish perceived risk. These results suggest opportunities for identifying other message features that may influence message and company trust, information processing, risk judgments, and attitudes related to DTC genetic testing.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Attitude
  • Cognition
  • Genetic Testing
  • Humans
  • Intention*
  • Trust*

Grants and funding

Data collection was supported by the Lewis Research Fund in the Department of Advertising & Public Relations at The University of Alabama. There was no additional external funding received for this study.