Previously published articles on anchors have mainly focused on determining the pullout force of the anchor (depending on the strength parameters of the concrete), the geometric parameters of the anchor head, and the effective anchor depth. The extent (volume) of the so-called failure cone has often addressed as a secondary matter, serving only to approximate the size of the zone of potential failure of the medium in which the anchor is installed. For the authors of these presented research results, from the perspective of evaluating the proposed stripping technology, an important aspect was the determination of the extent and volume of the stripping, as well as the determination of why the defragmentation of the cone of failure favors the removal of the stripping products. Therefore, it is reasonable to conduct research on the proposed topic. Thus far, the authors have shown that the ratio of the radius of the base of the destruction cone to the anchorage depth is significantly larger than in concrete (~1.5) and ranges from 3.9-4.2. The purpose of the presented research was to determine the influence of rock strength parameters on the mechanism of failure cone formation, including, in particular, the potential for defragmentation. The analysis was conducted with the finite element method (FEM) using the ABAQUS program. The scope of the analysis included two categories of rocks, i.e., those with low compressive strength (<100 MPa) and strong rocks (>100 MPa). Due to the limitations of the proposed stripping method, the analysis was conducted for an effective anchoring depth limited to 100 mm. It was shown that for anchorage depths <100 mm, for rocks with high compressive strength (above 100 MPa), there is a tendency to spontaneously generate radial cracks, leading to the fragmentation of the failure zone. The results of the numerical analysis were verified by field tests, yielding convergent results regarding the course of the de-fragmentation mechanism. In conclusion, it was found that in the case of gray sandstones, with strengths of 50-100 MPa, the uniform type of detachment (compact cone of detachment) dominates, but with a much larger radius of the base (a greater extent of detachment on the free surface).
Keywords: FEM simulation; failure cone; radial cracks; undercut anchor.