Predicting Arm Nonuse in Individuals with Good Arm Motor Function after Stroke Rehabilitation: A Machine Learning Study

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054123.

Abstract

Many stroke survivors demonstrate arm nonuse despite good arm motor function. This retrospective secondary analysis aims to identify predictors of arm nonusers with good arm motor function after stroke rehabilitation. A total of 78 participants were categorized into 2 groups using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scale (FMA-UE) and the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use (MAL-AOU). Group 1 comprised participants with good motor function (FMA-UE ≥ 31) and low daily upper limb use (MAL-AOU ≤ 2.5), and group 2 comprised all other participants. Feature selection analysis was performed on 20 potential predictors to identify the 5 most important predictors for group membership. Predictive models were built with the five most important predictors using four algorithms. The most important predictors were preintervention scores on the FMA-UE, MAL-Quality of Movement, Wolf Motor Function Test-Quality, MAL-AOU, and Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Predictive models classified the participants with accuracies ranging from 0.75 to 0.94 and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.77 to 0.97. The result indicates that measures of arm motor function, arm use in activities of daily living, and self-efficacy could predict postintervention arm nonuse despite good arm motor function in stroke. These assessments should be prioritized in the evaluation process to facilitate the design of individualized stroke rehabilitation programs to reduce arm nonuse.

Keywords: arm nonuse; chronic stroke; machine learning; predictors; stroke rehabilitation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Arm
  • Humans
  • Recovery of Function
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation*
  • Stroke*
  • Upper Extremity

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Health Research Institutes (grant numbers NHRI-EX109-10929PI, NHRI-EX110-10929PI, NHRI-EX111-10929PI) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant numbers MOST-108-2314-B-002-165-MY3 and MOST-111-2314-B-002-168-MY3) in Taiwan.