Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress CMR vs PET Following Coronary CTA

Ron Blankstein; Arthur Shiyovich

doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.01.004

Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress CMR vs PET Following Coronary CTA

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 May;16(5):656-658. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

Authors

Ron Blankstein¹, Arthur Shiyovich²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: rblankstein@bwh.harvard.edu.
² Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PMID: 36898937
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.01.004

No abstract available

Keywords: coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA); diagnostic accuracy; positron emission tomography (PET); second-line; stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

Publication types

Editorial
Comment

MeSH terms

Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease* / diagnostic imaging
Heart
Humans
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging*
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests