Constructing models that accurately predict Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics and are also amenable to large-scale deployment is a challenging task. In the United States, the emphasis has been on simple logistic regression (LR) models, which are easy to implement but may suffer from lower accuracies when compared with more complicated, harder-to-deploy (over large geographies) model frameworks such as functional or boosted regressions. This article examined the plausibility of random forests (RFs) for the binary prediction of FHB epidemics as a possible mediation between model simplicity and complexity without sacrificing accuracy. A minimalist set of predictors was also desirable rather than having the RF model use all 90 candidate variables as predictors. The input predictor set was filtered with the aid of three RF variable selection algorithms (Boruta, varSelRF, and VSURF), using resampling techniques to quantify the variability and stability of selected variable sets. Post-selection filtering produced 58 competitive RF models with no more than 14 predictors each. One variable representing temperature stability in the 20 days before anthesis was the most frequently selected predictor. This was a departure from the prominence of relative humidity-based variables previously reported in LR models for FHB. The RF models had overall superior predictive performance over the LR models and may be suitable candidates for use by the Fusarium Head Blight Prediction Center.
Keywords: Fusarium graminearum; binary classification; random forests; variable selection; wheat.