Scientific evidence on the efficacy of effervescent tablets for cleaning removable prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yolanda Martinez; Verónica Ausina; Carmen Llena; Jose M Montiel

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.031

Scientific evidence on the efficacy of effervescent tablets for cleaning removable prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis

J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar 2:S0022-3913(23)00074-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.031. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Yolanda Martinez¹, Verónica Ausina², Carmen Llena³, Jose M Montiel⁴

Affiliations

¹ Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stomatology and Radiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
² Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, European University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
³ Professor, Department of Stomatology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: llena@uv.es.
⁴ Professor, Department of Stomatology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

PMID: 36870893
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.031

Abstract

Statement of problem: Scientific evidence to determine the optimal method of cleaning and disinfecting removable prostheses is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of effervescent tablets in the cleaning and sanitizing of removable prostheses compared with other chemical and physical methods by assessing the reduction of biofilm, microbial levels, and material stability.

Material and methods: A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was conducted in August 2021 in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled clinical trials published in English were included without publication year limits. A total of 23 studies were included in the systematic review and 6 in the meta-analysis, which had been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42021274019). The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized clinical trials. The physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale was used to analyze the internal validity of clinical trials by assessing the quality of the data obtained. The studies included in the meta-analysis were combined by using a random-effects model with the inverse variance method. Publication bias was analyzed by using the Duvall and Tweedie trim-and-fill method.

Results: With regard to biofilm reduction, the standardized mean difference estimated with the 4 studies combined in the meta-analysis was P=.012: mean difference=-1.92; 95% confidence interval=-3.45 to -0.38, indicating a "large" effect of the combination of brushing and effervescent tablet versus brushing alone. To estimate the reduction in the total bacteria levels in the 3 combined studies, a "large" effect size was obtained for the combination of brushing and using an effervescent tablet versus brushing alone, P<.001: mean difference=-4.43; 95% confidence interval=-8.29 to -0.55. Finally, when the 3 studies were combined to assess the reduction of Candida or fungal infection, a "moderate" effect size was obtained for the combination of brushing combined with the use of an effervescent tablet, P<.001: mean difference=-0.78; 95% confidence interval=-1.19 to -0.37.

Conclusions: The combination of brushing and the use of effervescent tablets versus brushing alone had a significantly higher effect on reducing biofilm and bacterial counts and a moderate effect on reducing Candida. Regarding color and dimensional stability, few studies were found, with the results depending on the concentration of the product and the immersion time of the device.

Publication types

Review