Contrastive mechanisms of groundwater ammonium enrichment in different hydrogeologic settings

Shuai Shen; Teng Ma; Yao Du; Zhihui Han; Jingwei Zhang; Wenhui Liu; Kewen Luo

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162542

Contrastive mechanisms of groundwater ammonium enrichment in different hydrogeologic settings

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 1:875:162542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162542. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

Authors

Shuai Shen¹, Teng Ma², Yao Du³, Zhihui Han¹, Jingwei Zhang⁴, Wenhui Liu¹, Kewen Luo¹

Affiliations

¹ School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
² School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China. Electronic address: mateng@cug.edu.cn.
³ School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China. Electronic address: yaodu@cug.edu.cn.
⁴ School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.

PMID: 36870484
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162542

Abstract

Although high levels of geogenic ammonium in groundwater have been widely reported, the mechanisms controlling its heterogeneous distribution are not yet well understood. In this study, a comprehensive investigation of hydrogeology, sediments, and groundwater chemistry was coupled with a set of incubation experiments to reveal the contrasting mechanisms of groundwater ammonium enrichment at two adjacent monitoring sites with different hydrogeologic settings in the central Yangtze River basin. Significant differences were found in the ammonium concentrations of groundwater at two monitoring sites, with the ammonium concentrations in the Maozui (MZ) section (0.30-5.88 mg/L; average of 2.93 mg/L) being much higher than those in the Shenjiang (SJ) section (0.12-2.43 mg/L; average of 0.90 mg/L). For the SJ section, the aquifer medium had a low organic matter (OM) content and a weak mineralization capability, leading to a limited potential for geogenic ammonium release. Moreover, due to the presence of alternating silt and continuous fine sand layers (with coarse grains) above the underlying confined aquifer, the groundwater was in a relatively open environment with oxidizing conditions, which may have promoted the removal of ammonium. For the MZ section, the aquifer medium had a high OM content and a strong mineralization capability, leading to a much higher potential for geogenic ammonium release. Furthermore, due to the presence of a thick and continuous muddy clay layer (aquitard) above the underlying confined aquifer, the groundwater was in a closed environment with strong reducing conditions, which was conductive to the storage of ammonium. Larger sources of ammonium in the MZ section and greater consumption of ammonium in the SJ section contributed collectively to the significant differences in groundwater ammonium concentrations. This study identified contrasting mechanism of groundwater ammonium enrichment in different hydrogeologic settings, which can help explain the heterogeneous distribution of ammonium levels in groundwater.

Keywords: Ammonium; Geogenic; Groundwater; Hydrogeology; Mineralization.