An evaluation model for automobile intelligent cockpit comfort based on improved combination weighting-cloud model

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0282602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282602. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Aiming at the comfort evaluation of automobile intelligent cockpit, an evaluation model based on improved combination weighting-cloud model is established. By consulting relevant literature, 4 first-class indexes and 15 second-class indexes, including noise and vibration, light environment, thermal environment and human-computer interaction, are selected to establish a comfort evaluation system. Later the subjective and objective weights obtained by improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are combined by Game Theory. Considering the fuzziness and randomness of the index system, the combination weights obtained by Game Theory are combined with the cloud model. The floating cloud algorithms is used to determine the first-class and second-class index clouds and the comprehensive evaluation cloud parameters. Improvements were made in two commonly used similarity calculation methods, the expectation curve method (ECM) and the maximum boundary curve method (MCM). A new similarity calculation method is defined to optimize the evaluation results and determine the final comfort evaluation grade. Lastly, a 2021 Audi intelligent car under a certain working condition was selected to verify the correctness and rationality of the model using the fuzzy evaluation method. The results show that the cockpit comfort evaluation model based on the improved combination weighting-cloud model can better reflect the comprehensive comfort of automobile cockpit.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • Automobiles*
  • Game Theory
  • Humans
  • Intelligence

Grants and funding

This study was supported by:(1) The Open Research Fund of Sichuan Key Laboratory of Vehicle Measurement, Control and Safety (szjj2018-130); (2) Sichuan Province Innovation Training Project (S202210623064). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.