Hydrogels have been successfully employed as analogues of the extracellular matrix to study biological processes such as cells' migration, growth, adhesion and differentiation. These are governed by many factors, including the mechanical properties of hydrogels; yet, a one-to-one correlation between the viscoelastic properties of gels and cell fate is still missing from literature. In this work we provide experimental evidence supporting a possible explanation for the persistence of this knowledge gap. In particular, we have employed common tissues' surrogates such as polyacrylamide and agarose gels to elucidate a potential pitfall occurring when performing rheological characterisations of soft-materials. The issue is related to (i) the normal force applied to the samples prior to performing the rheological measurements, which may easily drive the outcomes of the investigation outside the materials' linear viscoelastic regime, especially when tests are performed with (ii) geometrical tools having unbefitting dimensions (i.e., too small). We corroborate that biomimetic hydrogels can show either compressional stress softening or stiffening, and we provide a simple solution to quench these undesired phenomena, which would likely lead to potentially misleading conclusions if they were not mitigated by a good practice in performing rheological measurements, as elucidated in this work.