Paradoxical experiences of healthcare workers during COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of anonymous, web-based, audio narratives

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2184034. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2184034.

Abstract

Purpose: To gain a deeper understanding of healthcare workers experiences during COVID-19 using an anonymous, web-based, audio narrative platform.

Methods: Data were collected from healthcare workers in the midwestern United States using a web-enabled audio diary approach. Participant recordings were analysed using a narrative coding and conceptualization process derived from grounded theory coding techniques.

Results: Fifteen healthcare workers, in direct patient care or non-patient care roles, submitted 18 audio narratives. Two paradoxical themes emerged: 1) A paradox of distress and meaningfulness, where a harsh work environment resulted in psychological distress while simultaneously resulting in new rewarding experiences, sense of purpose and positive outlooks. 2) A paradox of social isolation and connection, where despite extreme isolation, healthcare workers formed intense and meaningful interpersonal connections with patients and colleagues in new ways.

Conclusions: A web-enabled audio diary approach provided an opportunity for healthcare workers to reflect deeper on their experiences without investigator influence, which led to some unique findings. Paradoxically, amid social isolation and extreme distress, a sense of value, meaning and rewarding human connections emerged. These findings suggest that interventions addressing healthcare worker burnout and distress might be enhanced by leveraging naturally occurring positive experiences as much as mitigating negative ones.

Keywords: COVID-19; audio narratives; distress; healthcare workers; meaningfulness; paradoxical experiences; qualitative; social connectedness; social isolation; web application.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19*
  • Concept Formation
  • Grounded Theory
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Internet

Grants and funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Support for this study was provided internally by the Beaumont Research Institute and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.