Acute Pesticide Poisoning in Tobacco Farming, According to Different Criteria

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 5;20(4):2818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042818.

Abstract

Background: Brazil is one of the world's largest pesticide consumers, but information on pesticide poisoning among workers is scarce.

Objective: To evaluate acute pesticide poisoning among tobacco growers, according to different criteria.

Methods: This was a two-step cross-sectional study with 492 pesticide applicators. It used a 25 question pesticide-related symptoms (PRS) questionnaire and medical diagnosis for comparison with toxicological assessment. Associations were evaluated using Poisson regression.

Results: 10.6% reported two or more PRS, while 8.1% reported three or more. Furthermore, 12.2% received a medical diagnosis of poisoning. According to toxicologists, possible cases accounted for 14.2% and probable cases for 4.3%. PRS increased during the period of greater exposure. Those exposed to dithiocarbamates, sulfentrazone, pyrethroids, fipronil and iprodione exhibited more PRS. The number of exposure types, multi-chemical exposure, clothes wet with pesticides and spillage on the body/clothes were associated with acute poisonings. All criteria showed sensitivity greater than 79% for probable cases but only greater than 70% for medical diagnosis when compared to possible cases, presenting substantial Kappa agreement.

Conclusion: The prevalence of acute pesticide poisoning is much higher than officially recorded. Trained physicians can screen for pesticide poisoning. It is necessary to improve workers' education to reduce pesticide use and exposure to them.

Keywords: epidemiology; farmer; pesticide; poisoning; tobacco; toxicology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Agricultural Workers' Diseases* / epidemiology
  • Agriculture
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Nicotiana
  • Occupational Exposure*
  • Pesticides*
  • Poisoning* / epidemiology

Substances

  • Pesticides

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Process 483214/2009-4, 2009) and by the Research Support Foundation of the Rio Grande do Sul State (FAPERGS Process 09/0057.5, 2009).