Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review

Eye (Lond). 2023 Sep;37(13):2649-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02412-3. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

Amblyopia is an important public health concern. While home-based screening may present an effective solution, this has not been rigorously assessed in a systematic review. A systematic review was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of home-based screening tools for amblyopia among children were included. Studies involving orthoptist or ophthalmologist-led screening and adult subjects were excluded. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic accuracy expressed as sensitivity and specificity. Among 3670 studies identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review. The age range of patients were less than 1 month to 16 years old. 7 studies used internet-based tools, 16 used smartphone/tablet applications, 3 used digital cameras, and 3 used home-based questionnaires and visual acuity tools. All studies included a reference standard except one, which was a longitudinal study. 21 studies had full ophthalmological examination whilst 6 studies had validated visual acuity measurement tools as gold standards. Of the 27 studies which compared against a reference test, only 25 studies reported sensitivity and specificity values. Using the QUADAS-2 tool, 50% of studies were deemed to have applicability concern due to patient selection from tertiary centres and unclear methods for recruitment. There is a need to improve the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies, standardise thresholds for detecting amblyopia, and ensure consistent reporting of results. Further research is needed to evaluate the suitability of these tools for amblyopia screening.

摘要: 弱视是一个重要的公共健康问题。虽然基于家庭的筛查可能是一个有效的解决方案, 但这还没有在系统性回顾中得到严格的评估。我们使用Ovid MEDLINE、Pubmed、The Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science Core Collection和Clinicaltrials.gov进行了系统综述。并纳入所有研究儿童弱视评估以家庭为基础的筛查方法诊断准确性的文章。涉及视力矫正医师或眼科医生主导的筛查和以成人受试者为对象的研究被排除在外。主要结果指标是敏感性和特异性表示的诊断准确性。在确定的3670项研究中, 有28项纳入系统回顾。患者的年龄范围在1个月至16岁之间。其中7项研究使用基于互联网的评估工具, 16项研究使用智能手机/平板电脑应用程序, 3项研究使用数码相机, 3项研究使用基于家庭的调查问卷和视力工具。除了一项纵向研究以外, 所有的研究均包含参考标准。21项研究进行了全面的眼科检查, 而6项研究将有效的视力测量工具作为黄金标准。在与参考测试进行比较的27项研究中, 只有25项研究报告了敏感度和特异性值。经QUADAS-2工具评估, 50%的研究被认为有适用性问题, 原因是病人来自三级中心和招募方法不明确。需要提高诊断准确性研究的质量, 对检测弱视的阈值进行标准化, 并确保结果报告的一致性。未来需要进一步的研究评估这些方法是否适合用于弱视筛查。.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Amblyopia* / diagnosis
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Physical Examination
  • Sensitivity and Specificity