Purpose: Reliable process monitoring in real-time remains a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. Dealing with random and gross errors in the process measurements in a systematic way is a potential solution. In this paper, we present a process model-based framework, which for given sensor network and measurement uncertainties will predict the most likely state of the process. Thus, real-time process decisions, whether for process control or exceptional events management, can be based on the most reliable estimate of the process state.
Methods: Reliable process monitoring is achieved by using data reconciliation (DR) and gross error detection (GED) to mitigate the effects of random measurement errors and non-random sensor malfunctions. Steady-state data reconciliation (SSDR) is the simplest forms of DR but offers the benefits of short computational times. We also compare and contrast the model-based DR approach (SSDR-M) to the purely data-driven approach (SSDR-D) based on the use of principal component constructions.
Results: We report the results of studies on a pilot plant-scale continuous direct compression-based tableting line at steady-state in two subsystems. If the process is linear or mildly nonlinear, SSDR-M and SSDR-D give comparable results for the variables estimation and GED. SSDR-M also complies with mass balances and estimate unmeasured variables.
Conclusions: SSDR successfully estimates the true state of the process in presence of gross errors, as long as steady state is maintained and the redundancy requirement is met. Gross errors are also detected while using SSDR-M or SSDR-D. Process monitoring is more reliable while using the SSDR framework.
Keywords: Data reconciliation; Direct compression; Monitoring.