Objective: Psychological first aid (PFA) refers to evidence-supported intervention by nonmental health professionals to assist those affected by disaster to achieve stability. This study probed the level of PFA academic discourse on three important topics (race/ethnicity, general training and delivery, and online training delivery) and explored PFA training delivery trends.
Method: This study reviewed all available abstracts in the Web of Science database from 1975 to 2021 with keyword searches for PFA. The corpus linguistic analyses using #Lancsbox 6.0 and Sketch Engine explored the usage rate of PFA and how the PFA was used. The study also examined race/ethnicity, learning delivery except for online, and online training delivery methods. The change in online PFA training delivery with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic was analyzed using Tau with the subcorpora (2012-2020, 2020-2021).
Results: The race and diversity usage rates were only 6.11 per 10,000 counts, while the substantive discourse was on PFA service and delivery. There was a significant increase in PFA online training since COVID-19 started (Tau = 0.667, p = 0.041, SETau = 0.333).
Conclusions: Training and delivering online PFA is the safest method to meet the need for psychological aid during the global health crisis. Additionally, there is a significant need to address multicultural competency in PFA training and service delivery. PFA as an early critical intervention should be promoted as an early government response. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).