Impact of changes in clinical practice guidelines for intra-articular injection treatments for knee osteoarthritis on public interest and social media

C W Jang; M Bang; J H Park; H E Cho

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2022.12.013

Impact of changes in clinical practice guidelines for intra-articular injection treatments for knee osteoarthritis on public interest and social media

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Jun;31(6):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.12.013. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

Authors

C W Jang¹, M Bang², J H Park³, H E Cho⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: dearjcw89@gmail.com.
² Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ecretbang@gmail.com.
³ Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medical Device Engineering and Management, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Integrative Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: RMPJH@yuhs.ac.
⁴ Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: wtzephyr@yuhs.ac.

PMID: 36813156
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.12.013

Abstract

Objective: To summarize changes in recommendations for injection treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and to assess whether these changes have affected public interest according to Google data and content in YouTube videos.

Design: A literature search to identify CPGs revised since 2019 that provide recommendations regarding the five intra-articular injection treatments for knee OA (corticosteroid [CS], hyaluronic acid [HA], stem cell [SC], platelet-rich plasma [PRP], and botulinum toxin [BT]) was conducted to assess perspective changes for each treatment. Data from Google Trends were examined to identify changes in search volume from 2004 to 2021 using a join-point regression model. Relevant YouTube videos were divided into those uploaded before and after changes in CPGs and compared according to degrees of recommendation for each treatment to identify the effect of changes in CPGs on video production.

Results: All eight identified CPGs released after 2019 recommended HA and CS use. Most CPGs were the first to state a neutral or opposing stance concerning the use of SC, PRP, or BT. Interestingly, relative searches on Google for SC, PRP, and BT has increased greater than those for CS and HA. YouTube videos produced after CPGs changed continue to recommend SC, PRP, and BT as much as those produced before CPGs were revised.

Conclusions: Although knee OA CPGs have changed, public interest and healthcare information providers on YouTube have not reacted to this shift. Improved methods to propagate updates to CPGs warrant consideration.

Keywords: Guideline; Injection; Knee; Osteoarthritis; YouTube.

MeSH terms

Adrenal Cortex Hormones / therapeutic use
Humans
Hyaluronic Acid / therapeutic use
Injections, Intra-Articular
Osteoarthritis, Knee* / drug therapy
Platelet-Rich Plasma*
Social Media*
Treatment Outcome

Substances

Hyaluronic Acid
Adrenal Cortex Hormones