Development and comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD and N based ELISA tests in various African endemic settings

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;105(4):115903. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115903. Epub 2023 Jan 22.

Abstract

Management of the COVID-19 pandemic relies on molecular diagnostic methods supported by serological tools. Herein, we developed S-RBD- and N- based ELISA assays useful for infection rate surveillance as well as the follow-up of acquired protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. ELISA assays were optimized using COVID-19 Tunisian patients' sera and prepandemic controls. Assays were further validated in 3 African countries with variable endemic settings. The receiver operating curve was used to evaluate the assay performances. The N- and S-RBD-based ELISA assays performances, in Tunisia, were very high (AUC: 0.966 and 0.98, respectively, p < 0.0001). Cross-validation analysis showed similar performances in different settings. Cross-reactivity, with malaria infection, against viral antigens, was noticed. In head-to-head comparisons with different commercial assays, the developed assays showed high agreement. This study demonstrates, the added value of the developed serological assays in low-income countries, particularly in ethnically diverse populations with variable exposure to local endemic infectious diseases.

Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; Endemic African settings; Multicentric validation; Nucleoprotein N; S-RBD.

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Humans
  • Pandemics
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Tunisia / epidemiology

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral