Effect of Surgical Care Team Consistency During Urologic Procedures on Surgical Efficiency and Perioperative Outcomes

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of urologic surgical care team consistency on surgical efficiency and patient outcomes.

Methods: Patients undergoing major urologic surgery (prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy) at a single institution from 2010 to 2019 were identified. A surgical care team comprised a certified surgical assistant, certified surgical technologist, and circulating nurse. Primary team member status was assigned on a quarterly basis to team members present for the highest proportion of a surgeon's cases. Surgical efficiency outcomes included time to first incision, procedure duration, and turnover time. Perioperative clinical outcomes included hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission and reoperation rates. Outcomes were compared according to team consistency and assessed via univariate and multivariable analyses.

Results: Overall, 11,213 surgical procedures were included. Time to first incision, procedure duration, and turnover time were significantly lower in procedures performed with high-consistency teams (2-3 primary members) versus low-consistency teams (0-1 primary members) (all P <.001). After adjusting for patient-related variables, high-consistency teams were significantly associated with decreased time to first incision (estimate, -2.04 minutes; 95% CI, -2.68 to -1.41 minutes; P <.001) and turnover time (estimate, -7.23 minutes; 95% CI, -9.8 to -4.66 minutes; P <.001). For minimally invasive nephrectomy, high-consistency teams were associated with significantly decreased odds of prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P = .001). For robotic prostatectomy, high-consistency teams were associated with decreased procedure duration (estimate, -4.55 minutes; 95% CI, -7.48 to -1.62 minutes; P = .002).

Conclusion: Highly consistent surgical care teams were associated with improved surgical efficiency and patient outcomes.