Tap and inject of intravitreal antibiotics versus pars plana vitrectomy for post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of initial tap and inject (T/I) compared with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis following cataract surgery is unclear. Understanding the comparative safety and efficacy of initial T/I and initial PPV can provide context for treatment decision making in this setting.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to January 2021. Comparative studies reporting on final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following initial T/I or PPV in patients with infectious endophthalmitis secondary to cataract surgery were included. Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate the risk of bias, and GRADE criteria were used to assess certainty of evidence. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

Results: Seven nonrandomized studies reporting on 188 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. Initial T/I achieved a significantly better BCVA at last study observation than initial PPV (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.61 logMAR; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.03; p = 0.04; I² = 89%; n = 7 studies; GRADE = very low). The incidence of enucleation was similar between initial T/I and initial PPV (risk ratio [RR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.09-6.25; p = 0.78; I² = 4%; n = 2 studies; GRADE = very low). The risk of retinal detachment was similar between treatment modalities (RR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.01-5.94; p = 0.42; I² = 52%; n = 2 studies; GRADE = very low).

Conclusions: The quality of evidence in this setting is limited. T/I had a significantly better BCVA at last study observation than initial PPV. Safety profiles were similar between T/I and PPV.