Computational methods for the analysis of early-pregnancy brain ultrasonography: a systematic review

Wietske A P Bastiaansen; Stefan Klein; Anton H J Koning; Wiro J Niessen; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Melek Rousian

doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104466

Computational methods for the analysis of early-pregnancy brain ultrasonography: a systematic review

EBioMedicine. 2023 Mar:89:104466. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104466. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Authors

Wietske A P Bastiaansen¹, Stefan Klein², Anton H J Koning³, Wiro J Niessen², Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen⁴, Melek Rousian⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
² Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
³ Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
⁴ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
⁵ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.rousian@erasmusmc.nl.

Abstract

Background: Early screening of the brain is becoming routine clinical practice. Currently, this screening is performed by manual measurements and visual analysis, which is time-consuming and prone to errors. Computational methods may support this screening. Hence, the aim of this systematic review is to gain insight into future research directions needed to bring automated early-pregnancy ultrasound analysis of the human brain to clinical practice.

Methods: We searched PubMed (Medline ALL Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar, from inception until June 2022. This study is registered in PROSPERO at CRD42020189888. Studies about computational methods for the analysis of human brain ultrasonography acquired before the 20th week of pregnancy were included. The key reported attributes were: level of automation, learning-based or not, the usage of clinical routine data depicting normal and abnormal brain development, public sharing of program source code and data, and analysis of the confounding factors.

Findings: Our search identified 2575 studies, of which 55 were included. 76% used an automatic method, 62% a learning-based method, 45% used clinical routine data and in addition, for 13% the data depicted abnormal development. None of the studies shared publicly the program source code and only two studies shared the data. Finally, 35% did not analyse the influence of confounding factors.

Interpretation: Our review showed an interest in automatic, learning-based methods. To bring these methods to clinical practice we recommend that studies: use routine clinical data depicting both normal and abnormal development, make their dataset and program source code publicly available, and be attentive to the influence of confounding factors. Introduction of automated computational methods for early-pregnancy brain ultrasonography will save valuable time during screening, and ultimately lead to better detection, treatment and prevention of neuro-developmental disorders.

Funding: The Erasmus MC Medical Research Advisor Committee (grant number: FB 379283).

Keywords: Computational methods; Embryonic and fetal brain; First trimester; Ultrasonography.

Publication types

Systematic Review

MeSH terms

Brain*
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Ultrasonography